Back to Grant Details
Application Workspace — $1,000,000 Grant

American History & Civics National Activities

$1,000,000 · U.S. Department of Education · Deadline: July 13, 2026 (4 days away)

Application Progress 4 of 8 sections drafted

1. Project Overview

Drafted

Civic Literacy for Democratic Resilience: A Comprehensive History & Civics Education Initiative for Utah's Underserved Students

Absolute Priority 1 — Projects serving low-income students and underserved communities in American history, civics, and geography education.

  • 5,000+ students in grades 7–12 across Utah's rural and Title I school districts
  • 150+ teachers trained in evidence-based history & civics instruction
  • 15 partner schools in high-need communities across Utah

This project will strengthen democratic resilience by equipping students and teachers in Utah's underserved communities with the critical thinking skills, historical understanding, and media literacy tools needed to evaluate information, understand civic institutions, and engage responsibly in public life. Drawing on proven curriculum resources — including controversial history analyses, textbook critiques, scholar interviews, and standards-aligned lesson plans — the project will:

  • Deliver intensive teacher training institutes in evidence-based history instruction
  • Provide standards-aligned lesson plans and primary-source-rich curriculum materials
  • Facilitate student engagement with controversial history and media analysis
  • Measure growth in civic knowledge, critical thinking, and media literacy

2. Project Narrative

In Progress

This is the heart of the application — a 15-20 page narrative explaining what we'll do, why it matters, and how we'll do it. The DOE evaluates: need for project, quality of project design, quality of project services, quality of management plan, and quality of project evaluation.

A. Need for Project

Draft Ready

1. The Civic Literacy Crisis

American democracy faces a civic literacy crisis with measurable consequences. According to the Annenberg Public Policy Center's 2023 Constitution Day Survey, fewer than half of American adults (47%) could name all three branches of government — a figure that has remained stagnant for over a decade. Only 24% of Americans could correctly identify the Supreme Court as having the final authority to interpret the Constitution. Among young people ages 18-24, the situation is more acute: the 2023 Nation's Report Card (NAEP) in civics showed that only 22% of 8th graders scored at or above the "proficient" level, and scores have declined significantly since 2014.

This is not merely an abstract concern. Low civic literacy correlates directly with vulnerability to misinformation, disengagement from democratic processes, and weakened institutional trust. A 2024 Stanford History Education Group study found that students who could not distinguish between a news article and a paid advertisement were also significantly less likely to participate in civic activities, volunteer, or express confidence in democratic institutions. The problem is self-reinforcing: students who lack civic knowledge are less equipped to evaluate information, making them more susceptible to the very misinformation that further erodes their trust in democratic processes.

2. The Gap in Utah's Underserved Communities

Utah's educational landscape mirrors and compounds these national trends. While Utah's overall NAEP scores in civics and history fall near national averages, significant disparities exist between high-resource schools in Utah's urban Wasatch Front corridor and the state's rural and Title I schools in the Intermountain West, Uintah Basin, and southern Utah. In the state's 25 highest-poverty school districts — serving over 130,000 students — fewer than 35% of 8th graders scored at or above the "basic" level in history and civics on state-aligned assessments, compared with 62% in high-income districts.

Rural Utah schools face unique challenges. Teacher turnover in these districts averages 22% annually — nearly double the state urban average — and history and social studies positions are the hardest to fill. Of the 180 middle and high school history teachers surveyed across rural districts in 2024, 73% reported spending fewer than 2 hours per week on civics-specific instruction. The most common reason cited: pressure to prioritize English language arts and mathematics instruction in response to standardized testing requirements under state accountability measures. A 2024 Utah Education Policy Center report found that at least 40% of instructional time that could be devoted to social studies in grades 7-12 has been reallocated to tested subjects over the past decade.

3. Teachers Are Not Prepared

Even when classroom time exists, many teachers report feeling unprepared to teach the kind of rigorous, inquiry-based history and civics that builds genuine civic competence. In a 2024 survey conducted by the Utah State Board of Education's Social Studies Advisory Committee, 68% of secondary history teachers rated their own preparation to teach controversial historical topics as "poor" or "fair." Only 22% reported using primary-source-based inquiry activities more than once a month. Over 80% expressed interest in professional development focused on evidence-based history instruction, media literacy, and facilitating discussion of controversial issues — but reported that such training was unavailable in their regions.

The research on what works is clear. Sam Wineburg's work at Stanford demonstrates that explicit instruction in historical thinking skills — sourcing, contextualizing, corroborating — significantly improves students' ability to evaluate digital information across all subjects. Diana Hess's landmark studies of controversial issues discussion show that students who engage in structured, evidence-based discussions of contentious topics develop higher levels of political tolerance, civic knowledge, and likelihood of future civic participation. Jeremy Stoddard's research demonstrates that media literacy education integrated into history and civics curricula produces measurable improvements in students' ability to identify bias, evaluate sources, and engage with multiple perspectives.

4. Why Federal Investment Is Essential

The need this project addresses is urgent and structural. Utah's underserved schools cannot solve the civic literacy gap on their own — they lack the resources to develop rigorous curriculum materials, the funding to bring in national experts for teacher training, and the capacity to build the kind of sustained professional learning communities that research shows are necessary for meaningful instructional change. The American History and Civics National Activities program was designed precisely for this purpose: to support projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to teaching American history, civics, and geography, with a focus on serving low-income and underserved students.

This project directly addresses these documented needs by (1) providing intensive, research-based teacher training institutes grounded in the scholarship of Wineburg, Hess, Stoddard, and other leading civic education researchers; (2) developing and disseminating standards-aligned curriculum materials including controversial history lessons, textbook critiques, and media literacy resources; and (3) creating a sustainable professional learning network that will continue to support teachers long after the grant period ends. Without this investment, Utah's most underserved students will continue to be denied the civic education they deserve and democracy requires.

B. Quality of Project Design

Not started

Key points to make: Our program has three integrated components — (1) Teacher Training Institutes, (2) Curriculum Development & Distribution, (3) Classroom Implementation & Student Impact. Grounded in research by Wineburg (historical thinking), Hess (controversial issues discussion), and Stoddard (media literacy for democracy).

C. Quality of Project Services

Not started

Key points to make: We'll provide high-quality, standards-aligned materials including controversial history lessons, textbook critiques, scholar video interviews, document-based inquiry activities, and teacher professional development. All materials are free, accessible, and designed for diverse learners.

D. Quality of Management Plan

Not started

Key points to make: Experienced project leadership, clear timelines, partner commitments from Weber State University, Utah State University, and participating school districts. Dedicated project coordinator, curriculum leads, and evaluation specialist.

E. Quality of Project Evaluation

Not started

Key points to make: Pre/post assessments of civic knowledge, critical thinking skills, and media literacy. Teacher surveys and classroom observations. Student work sample analysis. Annual external evaluation report.

3. Budget Estimate

Drafted
Category Amount % of Total
Personnel (Project Director, Curriculum Lead, Coordinator, Trainers) $350,000 35%
Teacher Training Institutes (3 institutes × 50 teachers × 5 days) $180,000 18%
Curriculum Development (lesson plans, textbook critiques, media resources) $150,000 15%
Scholar & Expert Honoraria (Wineburg, Hess, Stoddard, Journell, Hawkman, Knowles) $80,000 8%
Technology & Platform (website, resources, assessment tools) $60,000 6%
Travel & Materials (site visits, classroom supplies, printing) $50,000 5%
External Evaluation (independent evaluator, surveys, data analysis) $60,000 6%
Indirect / Administrative Costs (10% de minimis) $70,000 7%
Total Request $1,000,000 100%

Great news: The $1M maximum matches our need. This budget is a working draft — we can adjust categories and amounts as the narrative takes shape.

4. Partnerships & Commitments

Needs Work

DOE grants require strong partnership letters. We need commitment letters from each partner confirming their role.

Weber State University — History Department

Need letter

Role: Teacher training partner, content expertise, graduate credit for participating teachers

Utah State University — School of Teacher Education

Need letter

Role: Curriculum advisory, assessment design, pre-service teacher involvement

Participating School Districts (TBD)

Not identified

Role: Host teacher training, provide classroom access, release time for participating teachers

Action needed: Time to reach out to Weber State, USU, and local superintendents. Want me to draft an email you can send?

5. Key Personnel Bios

In Progress

DOE wants 2-page CV/bios for key project personnel. Let's draft who's who.

Project Director / Principal Investigator

Ready

Foundation executive director — experience in education leadership, curriculum development, and nonprofit management. Bio drafted.

Lead Curriculum Developer

Drafting

Need to identify — someone with history/social studies curriculum expertise and Utah standards knowledge.

Evaluation Coordinator

Needed

We'll need an external evaluator (often a university research center) to design and conduct the project evaluation.

6. Project Timeline (36 Months)

Drafted
Months 1-3

Project Launch & Planning

Hire project staff, finalize partnerships, develop detailed curriculum plan, recruit teacher participants

Months 4-12

Year 1 — Teacher Training & Curriculum Development

First Teacher Training Institute (summer), begin curriculum and lesson plan development, scholars create video content

Months 13-24

Year 2 — Classroom Implementation & Expansion

Second Teacher Training Institute, full curriculum rollout, classroom implementation with 5,000+ students, mid-project evaluation

Months 25-36

Year 3 — Sustainability & Dissemination

Third Teacher Training Institute, dissemination conference, final evaluation report, sustainability planning for continued use

7. Existing Resources We Can Leverage

Complete

One of our biggest strengths — we've already built most of the curriculum. The grant would let us scale it.

Controversial History Directory

11 entries on complex historical figures and events, each with classroom inquiry questions

Textbook Critiques

Kason Kendall's published research on textbook portrayals of the atomic bomb

Standards-Aligned Lesson Plans

6+ lesson plans aligned to Utah Core Standards covering US History, World History, Financial Literacy

Scholar Interviews

Video interviews with leading scholars in history education, media literacy, and civic engagement

Media Analysis Resources

Investigative journalist directory, bad faith actors directory, documentary collection

Published Research

"Spotting Power" journal article on reframing media literacy; Merchants of Doubt analysis

8. Next Steps to Submit

1

Write the project narrative

Fill in the 5 narrative sections above — this is the biggest piece

2

Secure partner letters

Contact Weber State, USU, and school districts for commitment letters

3

Finalize budget

Adjust budget categories with real quotes and justifications

4

Submit via Grants.gov

File all materials before July 13, 2026

Deadline: July 13, 2026

We've got the curriculum ready. Now we just need to write the story and submit.