The Koch Network: Dark Money and the Reshaping of American Politics
Overview
The Koch network represents one of the most organized and well-funded political operations in American history. Built on a fortune originating from Fred Koch's collaboration with both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, the network has spent decades reshaping American politics, education, and public discourse through a coordinated strategy of think tanks, university programs, political advocacy, and dark money.
This research synthesizes material from Jane Mayer's Dark Money and other investigative reporting to trace how enormously wealthy donors transformed themselves from ridiculed "economic royalists" of FDR's day into the respected "other side" of a two-sided debate. They introduced doubt into areas of settled academic and scientific scholarship, undermined genuinely unbiased experts, and gave politicians a menu of conflicting statistics and arguments from which to choose.
-
Fred Koch built the third-largest refinery in the Third Reich through collaboration between Davis and Koch, and wrote in 1938 that the only sound countries in the world were Germany, Italy, and Japan.
-
Fred Koch was one of 11 original members of the John Birch Society, which wanted to impeach Chief Justice Earl Warren after Brown v. Board of Education.
-
Charles Koch attended the Freedom School, where crowds chanted "Annihilate them!" at the mention of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.
-
The Olin Foundation and Koch foundations spent decades building a "counter-intelligentsia" to challenge liberal dominance in universities.
-
DonorsTrust, described as the "dark-money ATM of the conservative movement," redistributed $750 million anonymously.
-
From 2005-2008, the Kochs poured nearly $25 million into dozens of organizations fighting climate reform.
-
Koch Industries was rated one of the top ten air polluters in the U.S., producing 950 million pounds of toxic waste.
Work Cited
Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right by Jane Mayer. Doubleday, 2016.
Key Sources
-
Jane Mayer Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right (2016)
-
The Olin Foundation Funded Heritage, AEI, Hoover, and university programs
-
DonorsTrust Distributed $750 million anonymously (1999-2015)
-
Koch Foundations Poured $25 million into climate denial (2005-2008)
-
Americans for Prosperity 550 staff in Florida (2014) — rivaled RNC operations
-
Citizens United (2010) Unlimited corporate political spending permitted
Key Components of the Koch Network
The Koch Family Origins
Fred Koch built his early fortune with a refinery process that was used by the Third Reich. In a 1938 letter, he wrote that the only sound countries in the world were Germany, Italy, and Japan. He also helped the Soviet Union build oil refineries, but after watching his Soviet acquaintances purged by Stalin, developed a deep hatred of communism. His sons Charles and David inherited both the fortune and the worldview. Fred sometimes beat his boys with a branch, and Charles emerged as the dominant son at a young age. The family hired a research historian, Clayton Coppin, to compile a family history, then fired him.
The John Birch Society
Fred Koch was one of the 11 original members of the John Birch Society, a far-right organization founded in 1958. The Birchers wanted to impeach Chief Justice Earl Warren after the Supreme Court voted to desegregate public schools in Brown v. Board of Education. Fred wrote that "The colored man looms large in the communist plan to take over America." The Society called out President Kennedy, who denounced their "crusades of suspicion and extremism."
The Freedom School
Charles Koch attended the Freedom School, led by radical thinker Robert LeFevre, which had close ties to the John Birch Society. LeFevre taught that government is "a disease masquerading as its own cure." The school taught a revisionist version of American history where robber barons were heroes and the Gilded Age was America's golden era. Taxes were denigrated as theft. The school taught that the Civil War shouldn't have been fought — the South should have been allowed to secede, and slavery was "a lesser evil than military conscription." A group of Illinois teachers who attended notified the FBI, describing the school as advocating "no government, no police department, no fire department, no public schools."
The Olin Foundation
John Olin worried government regulation and socialism were becoming too powerful after WWII. The Olin Foundation funded Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, and Hoover Institution. Under president William Simon (author of A Time for Truth), the foundation funded a "counter-intelligentsia" to challenge liberal intellectuals. Simon argued: "Ideas are weapons indeed the only weapon with which other ideas can be fought" and "Capitalism has no duty to subsidize its enemies." The foundation placed conservative scholars inside elite universities through the "beachhead strategy."
The Beachhead Strategy
Rather than funding small conservative colleges, the Olin Foundation and allied donors focused on penetrating elite universities like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. They established research centers, faculty programs, fellowships, and sponsored chairs. The strategy relied on "subtlety, indirection, and perhaps even some misdirection" — appearing academically legitimate while advancing conservative ideas. By funding over 100 faculty fellows, they cultivated a generation of conservative scholars who would influence law, policy, and public debate.
DonorsTrust and Dark Money
Conservative foundations began directing contributions through DonorsTrust, described by MotherJones as the "dark-money ATM of the conservative movement." Between 1999 and 2015, DonorsTrust redistributed $750 million from pooled contributions under its own name, masking the original donors. As criticism of climate change denial funding increased around 2007, tens of millions from fossil fuel interests seemed to disappear from public disclosure — while anonymous money from DonorsTrust simultaneously increased to fund the counter-movement.
Climate Change Denial
From 2005 to 2008, a single source — the Kochs — poured nearly $25 million into dozens of organizations fighting climate reform. Marc Morano, funded by Scaife, Bradley, and Olin foundations, attacked climate scientists, describing James Hansen as a "wannabe Unabomber" and Michael Mann as a "charlatan." The hacked "Climategate" emails were taken out of context, triggering investigations and death threats against scientists. Seven independent inquiries exonerated the scientists. Public concern about climate change among all but hard-core liberals collapsed.
Americans for Prosperity
The Kochs built their own political operation rivaling the Republican National Committee. In 2014 alone, AFP had 550 staff in Florida. AFP organized Tea Party rallies, forged letterheads from the NAACP to create fake grassroots opposition to climate legislation, and sent operatives to heckle politicians at town halls. Glenn Beck claimed cap-and-trade was about "redistributing wealth and water rationing." The AFP ran ads portraying environmentalists as wealthy hypocrites — an irony given the Kochs' own inherited fortunes.
Citizens United
The 2010 Supreme Court decision allowed unlimited corporate political spending as long as it was directed to independent outside groups. The ruling paved the way for unlimited donor contributions. Many of the lawyers who pushed for Citizens United were trained in Koch-funded centers at law schools. Polls showed large majorities of Americans — both Republicans and Democrats — favored strict campaign spending limits.
Education Influence
The Kochs directed millions into universities, funding centers that required influence over professors hired. BB&T bank chairman John Allison oversaw grants to 63 colleges — all required to teach Ayn Rand. At West Virginia University, the Koch-funded Center for Free Enterprise required the school to give donors say over professors. One funded professor wrote a book claiming mine safety regulations hurt workers. The Kochs also funded high school programs teaching that FDR didn't alleviate the Depression, minimum wage laws hurt the poor, and lower pay for women was not discriminatory.
Environmental Record
Koch Industries violated the Clean Water Act multiple times and falsified benzene emissions documents by 1/149th. A corroded Koch underground gas pipeline caught fire and killed two teenagers in Dallas in 1996. A former employee testified that when he raised concerns about the pipe, he was told paying damages from a lawsuit would be cheaper than repairs. The brothers were forced to pay $296 million to Danny Smalley. Employees testified of the "Koch method" of fudging pollution numbers. Bill's whistleblower suit was settled for $25 million. In 2010, Koch Industries was still rated one of the top ten air polluters in the U.S., producing 950 million pounds of toxic waste.
Academic Independence
The Kochs' funding of universities violated traditional standards of academic independence by requiring influence over professors. Charles Koch tried to push a revisionist history on his employees — that government interference caused the Great Depression, that FDR and Herbert Hoover were to blame, and that bankers and businessmen had been falsely accused. At Florida State, an undergrad complained that their economics professor taught that Keynes was bad, and their textbook claimed climate change wasn't caused by humans. The textbook had been given an F by an environmental group.
Climate Strategy
"Libertarianism is basically a corporate front masked as a philosophy," wrote Thomas Frank. The Kochs cast themselves as libertarians opposing taxes, regulations, and subsidies, but took full advantage of government contracts ($100 million in the decade after 2000) and subsidies for oil, ethanol, and pipelines. David Koch suggested that if climate change were real, it would be a "boon" because melting ice would free up more land for food production. Tom Perriello, a freshman Democrat who favored climate action, received forged letters on NAACP letterhead — arranged by Americans for Prosperity.
Political Intimidation
A Republican congressman from South Carolina shouted "You lie!" at President Obama during a 2009 health care address. Scientists received death threats. A self-described former CIA officer offered a $10,000 reward for dirt on climate scientist Michael Mann. The Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy in Pennsylvania successfully lobbied Republican legislators to threaten Penn State's funding unless they took action against Mann. The Landmark Legal Foundation (funded by Kochs) brought a lawsuit against Mann, promoted on nationally syndicated radio.
Dark Money System
DonorsTrust allowed donors to avoid the legal requirement that private foundations publicly disclose their grant recipients. As Brulle noted, tens of millions from fossil fuel interests seemed to disappear from public disclosure around 2007 while anonymous DonorsTrust money simultaneously increased. The Kochs described their political activities to the IRS as "non-political." Charles Koch tried to write an op-ed claiming he'd only been involved in politics for the last ten years — a claim contradicted by decades of political spending.
Grassroots vs. Astroturf
Polls showed that no grassroots Tea Party supporters argued for privatizing Social Security — entitlement programs were so popular they were virtually sacrosanct. The Tea Party described itself as nonpartisan, but polls showed three-quarters identified as Republican. Charles Koch once said he wanted poor people to have "hope that they can advance on their own merits" — while ironically explaining how his son Chase became president of Koch Fertilizer "on his own."
The Transformation of American Politics
The Koch network's long-term strategy, articulated by Richard Fink, divided the country into three parts and declared the battle was for the middle third. The network needed to persuade moderate, undecided voters that the intent of economic libertarians was virtuous. To do this, they formed unlikely partnerships with unlikely allies to counteract criticism that they were negative or divisive.
Lewis Powell, who became a Supreme Court justice, wrote a battle plan in 1971 detailing how conservatives needed to band together to defend free enterprise. Powell and others redefined existing political organizations such as Brookings and the New York Times as being equally biased on the liberal side, creating the framework for a "two-sided debate" where both sides were seen as equally credible.
As one observer noted: "Enormously wealthy right-wing donors had transformed themselves from the ridiculed, self-serving, 'economic royalists' of FDR's day into the respected 'other side' of a two-sided debate." They "introduced doubt into areas of settled academic and scientific scholarship, undermined genuinely unbiased experts, and gave politicians a menu of conflicting statistics and arguments from which to choose."
In 2013, Arthur Brooks explained that only a third of the public believed Republicans cared about everyday people. The Koch network's response was to invest even more heavily in image-making and strategic communications. By 2014, Katie Walsh, chief of staff of the RNC, acknowledged that the Kochs had "all but usurped the Republican party" with their own election system. Mark McKinnon, a political strategist who worked for both parties, described the result as an "oligarchy" where mega-donors tip the scale.
The story of the Koch network is a case study in how strategic philanthropic investment, when sustained over decades, can reshape the boundaries of political debate, the institutions of knowledge production, and the very structure of American democracy itself.
Discussion Questions & Further Reading
Sources
- Dark Money by Jane Mayer (Doubleday, 2016)
- A Time for Truth by William Simon
“- The Intellectuals and Socialism by Friedrich Hayek”
- More Guns, Less Crime by John R. Lott Jr.
- The Real Anita Hill by David Brock
- Illiberal Education by Dinesh D'Souza
- The Closing of the American Mind by Allan Bloom
Discussion Questions
“1. The Koch network's strategy was to influence intellectuals and institutions before directly engaging in politics. Is this a legitimate form of advocacy, or does it undermine democratic deliberation? What's the difference between "education" and "propaganda"?”
“2. DonorsTrust allowed donors to give anonymously to political causes while maintaining tax-exempt status. Should there be limits on anonymous political giving? What values are at stake on both sides of this debate?”
“3. The "beachhead strategy" placed conservative scholars inside elite universities. Is this a form of intellectual diversity, or does it compromise academic independence? How should universities handle donor influence over curriculum and hiring?”
“4. Polls showed that most Americans favored strict campaign spending limits after Citizens United, yet the ruling opened the floodgates. Is there a tension between free speech and democratic equality? How should that tension be resolved?”
“5. The Kochs claimed to support criminal justice reform while simultaneously backing politicians with harsh criminal justice records. When donors support multiple causes, should they be judged by their best actions or their worst?”
“6. "Libertarianism is basically a corporate front masked as a philosophy," wrote Thomas Frank. Do you agree or disagree? What evidence supports each position?”
“7. The climate change denial campaign succeeded in shifting public opinion even though seven independent investigations exonerated the scientists. What does this tell us about the relationship between money, media, and public understanding of science?”
© 2024 The History Education Foundation | Images from Wikimedia Commons
Support Our Historical Research
Help us continue providing high-quality resources for understanding key historical concepts.
Contact Us